@conference {bnh-2079,
	title = {Bringing hazard and economic modellers together: a spatial platform for damage and losses visualisation - peer viewed},
	booktitle = {Adelaide Conference 2015},
	year = {2015},
	address = {Adelaide, Australia},
	abstract = {<p>Research proceedings from the Bushfire and Natural Hazards CRC \&amp; AFAC Conference in Adelaide, 1-3 September 2015.\&nbsp;</p>},
	author = {Muhamman Rahman and Yiqun Chen and Katie Potts and Prasad Bhattacharya and Abbas Rajabifard and Mehmet Ulubasoglu and Mohsen Kalantari}
}
@conference {bnh-1561,
	title = {A Pre-Disaster Multi-Hazard Damage and Economic Loss Estimation Model Conference Paper 2014},
	booktitle = {Bushfire and Natural Hazards CRC and AFAC Wellington Conference 2014},
	year = {2015},
	abstract = {<p>Australia has witnessed a series of natural disasters throughout history that significantly affects its development trajectory. Examples include: cyclones Mahina (1899) in northern Queensland and Tracy (1974) in Darwin; floods in New South Wales (1955) and South-east Queensland (1974; 2011; 2012); earthquake in Newcastle (1989); landslide in Thredbo (1997); and bushfires in Victoria, South Australia, Tasmania and Australia Capital Territory (Black Saturday 2009; Canberra Fires 2003; Ash Wednesday 1983; Black Tuesday 1967; and Black Friday 1939). The resulting economic impact of these natural disasters is estimated to cost an average of AU$1.14 billion annually (BTE, 2001). This alarming statistic alone, along with its ever growing vulnerability due to rapid economic expansion in Australia, makes natural disasters a high priority issue for policy makers. In recent catastrophic natural disaster events, the emergency response of Australia has proven to be very effective at saving human lives. However the mitigation and preparedness of disaster risk reduction (DRR) appear to be less successful in avoiding the adverse economic impacts of natural disasters. One of the significant problems observed in this connection is the lack of effort to estimate the full economic impact of natural hazards, taking into account all the affected sections of the economy. This effort should consider not only the primary effects of the natural disasters, but also its secondary effects due to losses propagated through the economy arising out of possible inter-sectoral linkages. In order to achieve a paradigm shift from reactive response to a proactive risk reduction culture, disaster risk reduction measures need to be integrated into the economic development process. With this in mind, this paper discusses the shortcomings of current approaches and identifies the steps required for developing a system for increasing the disaster risk resilience of Australia.</p>},
	author = {Abbas Rajabifard and Mehmet Ulubasoglu and Katie Potts and Muhamman Rahman and Mohsen Kalantari and Prasad Bhattacharya}
}
