@article {bnh-7907, title = {High-Resolution Estimates of Fire Severity - An Evaluation of UAS Image and LiDAR Mapping Approaches on a Sedgeland Forest Boundary in Tasmania, Australia }, journal = {Fire}, volume = {4}, year = {2021}, month = {03/2021}, chapter = {14}, abstract = {

With an increase in the frequency and severity of wildfires across the globe and resultant changes to long-established fire regimes, the mapping of fire severity is a vital part of monitoring ecosystem resilience and recovery. The emergence of unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS) and compact sensors (RGB and LiDAR) provide new opportunities to map fire severity. This paper conducts a comparison of metrics derived from UAS Light Detecting and Ranging (LiDAR) point clouds and UAS image based products to classify fire severity. A workflow which derives novel metrics describing vegetation structure and fire severity from UAS remote sensing data is developed that fully utilises the vegetation information available in both data sources. UAS imagery and LiDAR data were captured pre- and post-fire over a 300 m by 300 m study area in Tasmania, Australia. The study area featured a vegetation gradient from sedgeland vegetation (e.g., button grass 0.2m) to forest (e.g., Eucalyptus obliqua and Eucalyptus globulus 50m). To classify the vegetation and fire severity, a comprehensive set of variables describing structural, textural and spectral characteristics were gathered using UAS images and UAS LiDAR datasets. A recursive feature elimination process was used to highlight the subsets of variables to be included in random forest classifiers. The classifier was then used to map vegetation and severity across the study area. The results indicate that UAS LiDAR provided similar overall accuracy to UAS image and combined (UAS LiDAR and UAS image predictor values) data streams to classify vegetation (UAS image: 80.6\%; UAS LiDAR: 78.9\%; and Combined: 83.1\%) and severity in areas of forest (UAS image: 76.6\%, UAS LiDAR: 74.5\%; and Combined: 78.5\%) and areas of sedgeland (UAS image: 72.4\%; UAS LiDAR: 75.2\%; and Combined: 76.6\%). These results indicate that UAS SfM and LiDAR point clouds can be used to assess fire severity at very high spatial resolutio

}, keywords = {3D remote sensing, drone, fire severity, fuel structure, Lidar, photogrammetry, RPAS, structure, UAS, vegetation}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.3390/fire4010014}, url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2571-6255/4/1/14/htm}, author = {Samuel Hillman and Bryan Hally and Luke Wallace and Darren Turner and Arko Lucieer and Karin Reinke and Simon Jones} } @article {bnh-5481, title = {Assessing the ability of image based point clouds captured from a UAV to measure the terrain in the presence of canopy cover}, journal = {forests}, volume = {10}, year = {2019}, month = {04/2019}, abstract = {

Point clouds captured from Unmanned Aerial Systems are increasingly relied upon to provide information describing the structure of forests. The quality of the information derived from these point clouds is dependent on a range of variables, including the type and structure of the forest, weather conditions and flying parameters. A key requirement to achieve accurate estimates of height based metrics describing forest structure is a source of ground information. This study explores the availability and reliability of ground surface points available within point clouds captured in six forests of different structure (canopy cover and height), using three image capture and processing strategies, consisting of nadir, oblique and composite nadir/oblique image networks. The ground information was extracted through manual segmentation of the point clouds as well as through the use of two commonly used ground filters, LAStools lasground and the Cloth Simulation Filter. The outcomes of these strategies were assessed against ground control captured with a Total Station. Results indicate that a small increase in the number of ground points captured (between 0 and 5\% of a 10 m radius plot) can be achieved through the use of a composite image network. In the case of manually identified ground points, this reduced the root mean square error (RMSE) error of the terrain model by between 1 and 11 cm, with greater reductions seen in plots with high canopy cover. The ground filters trialled were not able to exploit the extra information in the point clouds and inconsistent results in terrain RMSE were obtained across the various plots and imaging network configurations. The use of a composite network also provided greater penetration into the canopy, which is likely to improve the representation of mid-canopy elements.

}, keywords = {drones, Fire, forest measurement, image based point clouds, RPAS, structure from motion, UAS}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.3390/f10030284}, url = {https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/10/3/284}, author = {Luke Wallace and Chris Bellman and Bryan Hally and Jaime Hernandez and Simon Jones and Samuel Hillman} }